41 - SECOND VOLUME, FORTY-FIFTH LETTER

This letter was written for Khwâja Husam-ad-dîn Ahmat, who knew haqîqats and was possessed of ma’rifats. It explains that the entire universe is a mirror reflecting the Names and Attributes of Allâhu ta’âlâ, that they have no proximity to the Dhât-i-ilâhî, that matter cannot maintain its existence by itself, that matter is not a real being, and quite a number of other things:

Hamd-u-thenâ be to Allâhu ta’âlâ. Salvations be to people chosen and loved by him! My dear sir. A Persian line in English:

Whatsoever the subject, sweeter talks are those about the friend!

I am writing about ma’rifats that have never been heard, or heard of, before. Please listen well! I am informing you about the way of muraqaba of the highest people. Read very carefully! You should know that the ’âlam, [i.e. everything,] is a sampler of the Names and Attributes of Allâhu ta’âlâ, a mirror reflecting them. The life of the creature is a mirror of His Life, its knowledge is a mirror of His Knowledge, and its power is an appearance of His Power. So is the case with everything belonging to the slaves. However, the ’âlam does not contain a mirror reflecting the Dhât-i-ilâhî, [i.e. His Person.] In fact, the Dhât-i-ilâhî has no relation with this ’âlam. He has no partnership with anything. There is no participation or resemblance, neither in name, nor in image or appearance. He is ghanî from the ‘âlams, [He does not need anything.] Not so is the case with His Names and Attributes. With His Attributes; their names are correlated and their images and appearances are common with those of the ’âlam. Allâhu ta’âlâ has the Attribute ’Ilm (knowledge). The creature also has an image, a likeness of that knowledge. As He has the Attribute Power, likewise the latter also has an image of power. The case is quite different with the Dhât-i-ilâhî. Creatures have no allotment from His Person. They have not been given self-sufficiency to maintain their existence. Because creatures have been created in the images of His Attributes, they are attributes themselves. In actual fact, none of them is material. They have nothing to do with real matter, [that is, they do not stay in existence on their own.] It is with the Dhât-i-ilâhî that they stay in existence. Physicists and chemists classify things in two groups: Matter; and properties, attributes of matter. [According to them, “Matter, which is not a creature and will never cease to exists, maintains its existence on its own and is

-348-

the foundation-stone of the world.”] They say so because they do not know what matter is. [Recent experiences and experiments have brought about sweeping changes in the knowledge of matter held by chemists such as Lavoisier, Dalton, Robert Boyle, and their posterity in the same branch. According to Einstein’s theory of relativity, which is one of the bases of modern physics, energy, as well as matter, has a mass. Maybe, matter merely consists in condensed power.]

Chemists say that an attribute or a property cannot stay alone. It always stays with matter and qualifies matter. What they describe as an attribute’s staying with matter is, in actual fact, an attribute’s staying with another attribute. Both matter and the attribute exist and stay in existence with the Dhât-i-ilâhî. There is no matter that stays in existence on its own. He, alone, keeps all objects, everything in existence. In other words, Allâhu ta’âlâ is the Qayyûm-i-’âlam. How can attributes of matter stay with it despite the fact that matter does not stay in existence on its own. As attributes are not matter itself and can exist only with matter and cannot exist on their own, likewise matter and all things exist with the Dhât-i-ilâhî. None of them has a person of its own. And since matter does not have a person of its own, [i.e. since it itself does not exist,] attributes cannot exist with it, either. The Dhât (Person) is that of Allâhu ta’âlâ, alone. Everything exists with His Dhât. When any person says, “I,” about his person, he actually points to the same One Person, Who keep all beings in existence.

This is the truth, no matter whether those who say, “I,” know what they point to (by saying so) or not. However, Allâhu ta’âlâ can by no means be shown with any sign. He has not united with anything. A person who cannot understand this subtle piece of information should not confuse them with the tawhîd-i-wujûdî! A person who says the wahdat-i-wujûd says that nothing other than One Person exists. According to that person, His Names and Attributes exist only in theory. That person says that even the haqîqats of creatures have not seen wujûd [existence] and that “the a’yân [things] have not even experienced the smell of existence.” However, I, the faqîr, know the Sifât-i-ilâhiyya (Attributes of Allâhu ta’âlâ) to exist [not only in knowledge or in theory, but] separately in the outside. So do the scholars of Ahl as-Sunnat. In my knowledge, this ‘âlam, which is a mirror reflecting the Names and Attributes of Allâhu ta’âlâ, exists likewise, too. I cannot see in this ’âlam a state of existing by itself, i.e. being matter. I know well that everything is qâim, [i.e. stays in existence,]

-349-

with Allâhu ta’âlâ.

Question: That means to say that the person of creation is the same as the Dhât-i-ilâhî (Person of Allâhu ta’âlâ), and that everything has united with Allâhu ta’âlâ, which is quite contrary to fact. Could the creation ever be the same as the eternal one?

Answer: The person of creation, i.e. the nature and the haqîqat of creatures, consists in a number of symptoms and states, which are mirrors reflecting the Names and Attributes of Allâhu ta’âlâ, and these things are not the same as the Dhât-i-ilâhî. Nor are they united with the Dhât-i-ilâhî. Only, these states exist with the Dhât-i-ilâhî. He, alone, is the Qayyûm of all, [i.e. He who keeps all in existence.]

Question: Inasmuch as everyone who says, “I,” points to the Dhât-i-ilâhî by saying so, the person of creation, i.e. their nature and haqîqat, is the same as That of the Dhât-i-ilâhî. For, anyone who says, “I,” points to their own haqîqat and nature by saying so. Don’t holders of the Tawhîd-i-wujûdî say so, too?

Answer: Yes, it is true. Everyone who says, “I,” points to their own haqîqat. Yet since their haqîqat consists in an asemblage of states, they can not be pointed to. For, states can not be pointed to as self-standing entities. Since man’s haqîqat does not admit of being pointed to, when it is pointed to, its Qayyûm, i.e. the Dhât-i-ilâhî will have been indicated. Then the creature and the Creator are different from each other. The fact is not as the holders of the tawhîd-i-wujûdî say. It is so amazing that although Haqq ta’âlâ is pointed to when the creature says. “I,” the creature still retains its own being and continues to be the creature, which in turn makes it (sound) incorrect to say, “Subhânî,” or “Ana-l-Haqq.” Maybe, he cannot say so because he perceives the difference.

Question: Doesn’t the creature’s existing with Allâhu ta’âlâ mean a change in Allâhu ta’âlâ, which in turn is out of the question?

Answer: The creature has not been integrated with Allâhu ta’âlâ or united with Allâhu ta’âlâ. The only event is that it exists with Allâhu ta’âlâ.

Question: Since creatures consist only in symptoms, states, and attributes, there has to be a place for them to be attached to. For, as we said earlier, they cannot be on their own. That place cannot be the Dhât-i-ilâhî, either. Nor can it be the adam [non-existence]. Where is that place?

-350-

Answer: The a’râz, [i.e. states and attributes,] can not stay in existence on their own. They have to be with something else. Because physicists construe this togetherness as integration, they look for a place for the a’râz. They say that the a’râz cannot state in the absence of a place. However, existence in the meaning where we use it does not require a place. We understand that everything exists with the Dhât-i-ilâhî in a manner that does not involve integration or a location. Physicists may or may not believe what we say. Their denial can not change what we see and know. We know that this is the case. Their scepticism cannot obliterate our knowledge. Let us explicate our argument with an example: Conjurers show unusual things. All the spectators know that the appearances being conjured up do not exist on their own. They know that they stay with the conjurer and yet not at a place. They know also that they have not united with the conjurer. It is only with him that they exist. In a similar manner Allâhu ta’âlâ has created the things at the level of perception and imagination. Only with Him do they stay in existence. He has made eternal torment or infinite blessings dependent on these creatures of His. These things do not stay in existence on their own. They stay with the Dhât-i-ilâhî without integration or union. A second example would be the image of a mountain or the sky in a mirror. A person devoid of mind will look on such images as real objects. He will say that they exist on their own in the mirror. However, if someone looks on the images as attributes, says that they exist with the mirror, and looks for a place for them, he must be a stupid jackass who denies his own obvious knowledge for the sake of following others. For, any person with reason knows that these images do not have a location, that they do not need a location. Likewise, people of kashf and shuhûd see all things as if they were images in a mirror. Allâhu ta’âlâ has given power to these images and protected them from ceasing to exist. And He has made the eternal activities in the Hereafter consequent upon (the doings of) these images. Nizâm, one of the superiors of (the branch of knowledge termed) Kalâm and a scholar in the Madhhab called Mu’tazila, deemed everything as an attribute and denied (the existence of) matter. He was too short-sighted to know that these attributes stayed in existence with Haqq ta’âlâ. He was censured by people who had reason. For, an attribute has to stay with something else. The author of the book Futûhât-i-Makkiya, [i.e. Muhyiddîn-i-’Arabî,] ‘quiddisa sirruh’, one of the great Awliyâ and profound scholars called the Sôfiyya-i-aliyya, said: “All things

-351-

are atributes, all of which stay in existence with one Being, who is the Dhât-i-ilâhî, (i.e. Allâhu ta’âlâ Himself.) Yet these attributes exist only for a moment. They can not stay in existence for two times. Every moment the entire ’âlam ceases to exist, to be substituted by a new one. This process is repeated every moment.” According to this faqîr, (Hadrat Imâm Rabbânî means himself,) that is a view, rather than a fact. I explained this in the annotation to the book Sharkh-i-rubâ’iyyât. In a few words: People who progress along a path of Tasawwuf, before they attain their final destination, i.e. before the entire ’âlam disappears for good from their sight, see for a moment that the ’âlam is non-existent. The next moment they see that it exists. The third moment it disappears from their sight again. The fourth moment it is there again, and they see it. These momentary changes of sight continue until they are honoured with Fanâ, i.e. until the entire ’âlam is continuously non-existent in their sight. When Fanâ is attained a (spiritual) state will also be attained wherein the ’âlam is always non-existent in their knowledge.

-352-

1 - Our Prophet 'sall-Allâhu 'alaihi wa sallam' stated: "A person whom Allâhu ta'âlâ loves very much is one who learns his religion and teaches it to others. Learn your religion from the mouths of Islamic scholars!"

A person who cannot find a true scholar must learn by reading books written by the scholars of Ahl as-sunna, and try hard to spread these books. A Müslim who has 'ilm (knowledge), 'amal (practising what one knows; obeying Islam's commandments and prohibitions), and ikhlâs (doing everything only to please Allâhu ta'âlâ) is called an Islamic scholar. A person who represents himself as an Islamic scholar though he lacks any one of these qualifications is called an 'evil religious scholar', or an 'impostor'. The Islamic scholar will guide you to causes which in turn will open the gates to happiness; he is the protector of faith. The impostor will mislead you into such causes as will make you end up in perdition; he is the Satan's accomplice.[1] (There is a certain) prayer (called) Istighfâr (which), whenever you say, (recite or read) it, will make you attain causes which will shield you against afflictions and troubles.

2 - The Nejât-ul-musallî was written in Turkish in the year 1217 (A.H.) by Ahmed Þevki Efendi, and was printed in Ýstanbul in 1305. Ýt consists of a hundred and ninety-seven (197) pages. Ýt is stated as follows on its final page: Ibni Jezerî, (751 [1350 A.D.], Damascus - 833 [1429], Shîrâz,) states as follows in his book Hisn ul-hasîn: A hadîth-i-sherîf reads as follows: "If an invalid person says Lâ ilâha illâ anta subhânaka innî kuntu min-az-zâlimîn,' forty times, he will die as a martyr (if his predetermined life-span is over). If he recovers, all his sins will be pardoned." This prayer is the eighty-seventh âyat-i- kerîma of Anbiyâ sûra. Please see the final parts of the thirteenth and the fifteenth chapters of the current book!

---------------------------------

[1] Knowledge that is acquired not for the purpose of practising it with ikhlâs, will not be beneficial. Please see the 366th and 367th pages of the first volume of Hadîqa, and also the 36th and the 40th and the 59th letters in the first volume of Maktûbât. (The English versions of these letters exist in the 16th and the 25th and the 28th chapters, respectively, of the second fascicle of Endless Bliss).