17 – THINGS THAT NULLIFY NAMĀZ

The following writing is translated from Durr-ul-mukhtār:

Things that nullify namāz are called mufsids. A worship being fāsid or bātil is the same; it means it is broken, nullified. In mu’amalāt these are not the same. The following are the thirty-one mufsids of namāz:

1 - To talk. Even one word nullifies namāz. It always nullifies namāz no matter whether it is said intentionally or inadvertently or under duress or by forgetting. However, it does not nullify namāz to say the salām in the first sitting thinking that it is the second sitting. Yet if you say, “Assalāmu,” thinking that the namāz is of two rak’ats, or if you say it while standing, namāz becomes nullified. To respond to someone else’s greeting in any manner whatsoever, nullifies namāz.

2 - Without a good excuse, coughing through the throat nullifies namāz. If it happens involuntarily, it does not nullify namāz. If you do it in order to facilitate your recitation, it is harmless.

3 - To say prayers in namāz that do not exist in āyats or hadīths nullifies namāz. It is written in Durr-ul-mukhtār: “The prayer to be said before making the salām has to be in Arabic. It is harām to pray in any other language during namāz.” At this point Ibni Ābidīn explains: “Imām-i Abū Yūsuf and Imām-i Muhammad said that namāz performed in any language other than Arabic would not be accepted. Imām-i a’zam’s (rahmatullāhi ’alaihim) ijtihād tallies with it.”

4 - To moan or to say “Ouch!” etc. nullifies namāz.

5 - To say, “Ugh!” in order to express annoyance nullifies namāz.

6 - Crying for reasons such as a pain or sorrow nullifies namāz. If you weep silently, or cry loudly because of the thought of Paradise and Hell, namāz does not become nullified. If a sick person cannot help saying “Ouch, ugh!” or crying, namāz does not become nullified.

7 - It nullifies namāz to say “Yerhamukallah” to a person who sneezes and says, “Al-hamdulillāh.” When not performing namāz, it is fard kifāya to say the former immediately after each of the three instances of the latter, and it is mustahab after the third time [Riyād un-nāsihīn].

8 - To say, “Innā lillāh wa...,” upon hearing bad news nullifies

-255-

namāz. It is sunnat to say it while not performing namāz.

9 - To say “Jalla Jalāluh” and “Sallallāhu alaihi wa sallam,” upon hearing the names of Allahu ta’ālā and the Prophet ‘sallallāhu alaihi wa sallam’ nullifies namāz. Outside of namāz, saying or writing them is wājib for the first time and mustahab for those times afterwards of saying, hearing or writing their names.

10 - To say “Āmīn” for a prayer said by anyone but the imām nullifies namāz. [For this reason, if the imām is conducting a namāz in jamā’at (see chapter 20) with a loudspeaker, when he says, “Walad’dāllīn,” the namāz of those who say, “Āmīn” may become nullified. For the sound produced by the loud-speaker is not the imām’s voice. It is some other sound produced by a metal plate that vibrates because of the magnetic power caused by electricity. Such sounds, which are originally caused by the human voice, are indistinguishable from their producers’ voices, but in actual fact they are not their voices, as it will be explained in detail in Chapter 24]. When the imām finishes reciting the Fātiha, it is mekrūh for the imām and for the jamā’at to say “Āmīn” loudly. They must say it softly.

11 - To change your place or to make room for a newcomer with someone else’s warning nullifies namāz. But your moving of your own will a little some time later does not nullify it.

12 - To correct the mistake of anyone except the imām you follow nullifies namāz.

13 - Even if a little, or by forgetting, eating or drinking by placing something in the mouth nullifies namāz. It does not nullify namāz to swallow something smaller than a chick-pea that has remained between the teeth. It does not break a fast, either. To chew something small in your mouth three times or to swallow it by melting it nullifies namāz.

14 - To say the prayers by reading and learning them from the Qur’ān al-kerīm or from some other paper nullifies namāz. To do so would mean to learn the prayers from someone else. Imām-i Muhammad and Imām-i Abū Yūsuf said that it would be mekrūh. If you do not think of yourself being like a disbeliever with a Holy Book, they said it would not be mekrūh, either.

Understanding something by looking at a piece of writing or something [i.e. picture on the wall] does not nullify namāz.

-256-

If one understands a writing, it is mekrūh. It does not become mekrūh if it only meets one’s eyes by chance.

[Doing the customs of disbelievers, if not with the intention of being like them, if they are not harām or evil customs, and if they are useful, is permissible. Eating and drinking like them is an example of this. It is harām if it is done in order to become like them, or if they are harām and bad customs.

It is written in Uyūn-ul-basāir[1]: “If a person draws a portrait of a man and prostrates in front of it in the name of Hadrat Īsā or makes a statue for prostration or wears a girdle like the one which has been worn by Jews and Christians, he becomes a disbeliever. If a person wears clothings peculiar to disbelievers in order to trick them in war, he does not become a disbeliever.” It is excusable if he wears them only long enough to save his life, property, and sustenance. It is disbelief to wear them any longer. As written in most of the books of Aqāid (belief) and fiqh, particularly in Durer[2], in its chapter preceding the subject of Nikāh: “If a person, no matter whether his heart is filled with īmān, says a word causing disbelief without a strong necessity, that is, willingly, he becomes a disbeliever. The īmān in his heart will be of no use then. For a person’s disbelief is judged from his words. When he says a word causing disbelief, he becomes a disbeliever both among the people and to Allahu ta’ālā.” It is written in the third chapter of the sixth section of the book Sharh-i mawāqif that the case is the same with the kufr-i hukmī (judged disbelief) caused by actions and ways of dressing].

It is disbelief to do things which disbelievers practice as

---------------------------------

[1] Written by Ahmad Hamawī, (d. 1098 [1686 A.D.]). It is a commentary to Eshbāh, a valuable book written by Ibni Nujaym Zeyn-ul-'ābidīn bin Ibrāhīm ibni Nujaym-i-Misrī 'rahmatullāhi 'alaih', 926 - 970 [1562 A.D.], Egypt.)

[2] Durer ve Ghurer, a splendid book of Fiqh written by the third Ottoman Shaikh-ul-Islām, Molla Husrev 'rahmatullāhi ta'ālā 'alaih', (d. 885 [1480 A.D.], Istanbul, buried in Bursa.)

-257-

worships, e.g. to play organs, to ring bells in mosques as Christians do in churches, or to use things that the Sharī’at considers symptoms of disbelief, unless there is a darūrat or compulsion; it removes īmān. [Please see the final part of the seventy-second chapter of the second part of the Turkish version.]

15 - Extra movements that are not parts of namāz nullify namāz. Making the rukū’ or the sajdas more than the prescribed number or going out to make ablution does not nullify it. Excusable extra movements such as killing a scorpion or a snake does not nullify it, either. [See the seventeenth and the twenty-sixth mekrūhs!] If a hand moves less than three times, it does not nullify namāz. It has been said (by savants) that one movement with both hands nullifies namāz. Raising the hands up to the ears for the takbīrs in namāz does not nullify namāz. Yet it is mekrūh.

16 - To stand and to make the sajda at a najs place nullifies namāz. If you spread something over the najs place, namāz will not become nullified. Shoes and clothes that you have on are like parts of your skin. You cannot make the sajda by placing the skirt of your overcoat over a najs place. You must take it off and spread it on the ground. [You cannot perform a janāza namāz with shoes smeared with najāsat].

17 - If your awrat parts remain open long enough for you to say “Subhān-Allāh” three times in one rukn, if the amount of najāsat prescribed to nullify namāz exist on your skin and clothes, if you make namāz ahead of the imām, and if you are in the same line with a woman [who has been following the same imām], your namāz becomes nullified. If you yourself do all these, your namāz will be broken immediately. [See chapter 20, The Namāz in Jamā’at!]

18 - To perform namāz on something which you have spread over a najs place but which lets colour, odor and moisture through nullifies namāz. If it does not let them through, namāz does not become nullified. Performing it after covering the place with plenty of earth does not nullify namāz.

19 - Turning your chest away from the qibla without a good excuse breaks namāz immediately. Turning your face or any other limb away does not nullify namāz, yet it is mekrūh. If you cannot help turning away, it nullifies namāz if you remain so as long as one rukn. Walking one line (one metre and half) towards the qibla, does not nullify namāz. If not in the direction of the qibla, or if you walk more than that continuously in the direction of the qibla, it nullifies namāz. For this reason, it is not permissible to perform

-258-

namāz while walking.

20 - When a woman is kissed or held lustfully, her namāz becomes nullified.

21 - The namāz of a person who apostates by heart becomes nullified. [That is, if he says through his heart, “If such and such a thing happens, so and so’s word proves true, and the Qur’ān proves to be – may Allahu ta’ālā protect us against such thoughts!–untrue,” or if a girl decides to marry a disbeliever, he, or she, becomes a disbeliever immediately]. A person who intends to become a disbeliever in the future or who believes something causing disbelief becomes a disbeliever, that is, a renegade immediately.

22 - While performing namāz, it is harām to do something that will break your ablution or ghusl. If a person does any one of them before having sat as long as the tashahhud in the last rak’at, his namāz immediately becomes nullified. If he does it after having sat as long as the tashahhud, his namāz will be all right. If his ablution breaks by itself, he may renew it and then continue with his namāz, but it is better to perform it again from the beginning. After having sat as long as the tashahhud, if it breaks by itself, and if he makes an ablution at once and makes the salām, which is wājib or, without making an ablution, if he does something breaking the namāz, e.g. makes the salām, his namāz will be complete.

23 - If a person omits one rukn and does not perform it during the namāz, his namāz becomes nullified.

24 - If a person begins and finishes a rukn before the imām begins it, his namāz becomes nullified. But if the imām begins the rukn later and they finish it at the same time, or if he gives up making that part of the namāz before the imām begins the rukn and then, when the imām begins the rukn, makes the rukn again together with the imām, the namāz does not become nullifed, yet it is mekrūh. If a person begins a rukn after the imām has finished it, his namāz will be acceptable.

25 - One who misses the first rak’at of the jamā’at is called a masbūk. If a masbūk, after having sat as long as (to say the prayer called) the tashahhud and before the imām makes the

-259-

salām, stands up and makes sajda and then sees the imām making sajda-i sahw and if he, too, makes the sajda-i sahw with the imām, his namāz is nullified. Without following the imām, he makes the sajda-i sahw after completing his namāz. If he stood up but did not make sajda, it is wājib for him to sit and make the sajda-i sahw with the imām.

26 - If a person who forgot to make the sajda remembers it during the rukū’, he prostrates and makes the sajda right after the rukū, and (if he remembers it) during the sajda, he makes the sajda (that he forgot) after sitting after the regular sajda; then he makes the rukū’ and the sajda again. Then he makes the sajda-i sahw. Or, at the end of or during the final sitting he makes the sajda which he remembered or which he remembers during the final sitting, then he sits again and says the Tahiyyāt, and then makes the sajda-i sahw. If he does not sit again, his namāz becomes nullified.

27 - If a person does not perform again the rukn that he performed while sleeping, his namāz becomes nullified.

28 - If during the takbīrs in namāz a person prolongs the first hamza[1] (A) when saying “Allahu,” his namāz becomes nullified. If he prolongs it when beginning namāz, his beginning the namāz is not sahīh.

29 - If saying the āyats melodiously changes the meaning, it nullifies namāz, too. To recite the Qur’an melodiously means to prolong its letters in order to tune them to musical notes. For example, it changes the meaning to prolong the letter (a) as in “Alhamd-u-lillāhi rābbil.” Likewise, saying “Rābbanālakalhamd,” as some muazzins do, changes the meaning. For rāb means stepfather; so instead of saying, “We thank our Allah,” they say, “We thank our stepfather.” If the meaning is not changed, namāz does not become nullified. But if you extend such vowels as Elif, Waw and Yā too long, namāz becomes nullified, even if the meaning is not changed. As seen, if saying the words

---------------------------------

[1] Elif, the first letter of the Arabic alphabet.

-260-

melodiously does not change their meaning, if the letters are not prolonged as long as two letters, and if it is intended to beautify the voice and to embellish the recitation, it is permissible. In fact, it is mustahab to do so when performing namāz as well as when not performing namāz.

It is written in the fatwā of Abussu’ūd Efendi[1]: “If the imām’s singing becomes ’amal-i kesīr[2] , or if he prolongs one letter as long as three letters, his namāz becomes nullified. To say something melodiously means to sing it, to repeat your voice in your larynx so as to produce various sounds.”

30 - An incorrect recitation nullifies namāz. The error may happen in four different ways. The first error involves i’rāb, that is, it takes place in the vocalization or absence of letters. For instance, when you don’t double the letter with the shadda[3] or when you say the prolonged ones too quickly, and vice versa.

The second kind of error takes place among the letters themselves. For example, you change the place of a letter, add or deduct a letter, or move a letter forward or backwards.

The third error involves confusion of words or sentences. And finally, the fourth error concerns the waqf-wasl[4] ; that is, when you go on where you must pause or pause where you must go on. This fourth kind of error does not nullify namāz even if the meaning is changed.

If the first three kinds of errors change the meaning or produce a meaning that causes disbelief, namāz becomes nullified. But when you change the place of a sentence, if you pause for a while, namāz does not become nullified. If some newly produced meaning does not cause disbelief but if it does not have a likeness in the Qur’ān, namāz becomes nullified. To say ‘gubār’ instead of ‘gurāb,’ to

---------------------------------

[1] The thirteenth Ottoman Shaikh-ul-Islām

[2] Kesīr means many. 'Amal means action, movement. 'Amal-i kesīr means more than one movements. Doing 'amal-i-kesīr in namāz nullifies namāz.

[3] Germination mark. When you see that mark above an Arabic consonant letter, you repeat the letter as if there were two of them.

[4] Waqf means pause. When reading or reciting the Qur'ān, you have to stop when you see certain symbols. These symbols are called Waqf. Wasl means to link the final consonant of an Arabic word to the first vowel of the word following it. Symbols indicating such linkage are called Wasl

-261-

say ‘Rabinās’ instead of ‘Rabbinnās,’ to say ‘zalelnā’ instead of ‘zallelnā,’ to say ‘emāratun’ instead of ‘emmāretun,’ to add the word “wa kefere” by saying “amile sālihan wa kefere fa lehum ejruhum,” to say ’mesānīne’ instead of ‘mesānī’, to say “essirātellezīne” or “iyyā kena ’budu,” [that is, to divide one word and add its final part to the following word], to forget “wa” when saying “wa mā khalaqazzekere,” nullifies namāz. If the word becomes meaningless and if it does not have a likeness in the Qur’ān al-kerīm, it nullifies namāz. For instance, to say ‘serāil’ instead of ‘serāir,’ to say ‘laqnā,’ instead of ‘khalaqnā’, to say ‘alnā’ instead of ‘ja’alnā.’ If the word has a likeness in the Qur’ān but if its meaning is different, namāz does not become nullified according to Imām-i Abū Yūsuf’s ijtihād. But it becomes nullified according to the Tarafain, i.e. Imām-i a’zam and Imām-i Muhammad. The fatwā agrees with the second ijtihād. If the word has no likeness but if its meaning is not changed, they judged it the other way round. The fatwā agrees with the Tarafain’s. For example, when you say “ihdinelsirāta” or “Rabilālemin” or “Żyāke,” or when you say “yā mālī” instead of “yā mālik,” or when you say “ta’al” while saying “ta’ālā yeddu Rabbinā,” namāz does not become nullified. [When you say “ahat” instead of “ahad” namāz becomes nullified. (Bezzāziyya)]

Later savants said that errors in the i’rāb would not nullify namāz. The first is a way of prudence, and the second is a way of permission.

Pronouncing one letter like another letter, if the two letters are quite different, nullifies namāz. For example, to pronounce the letter “Ta” instead of the letter “Sāt,” as in “tālihat” instead of “sālihat.” If there is a small difference between the letters and if the meaning is changed, “namāz becomes nullified if you did it intentionally,” said most savants. But if it slipped out inadvertently, “namāz does not become nullified,” they said. Examples of this are to pronounce the letter “Zż” instead of “Dat,” “Sāt” instead of “Sin,” or “Tż” instead of “Te.” Though the fatwā says so, one must be cautious. So is the case with saying “zāllīn” instead of saying “dāllīn.” [For more details see chapter 20, Namāz in Jamā’at!]

When you add a word, if the meaning does not change and if the word exists in the Qur’ān al-kerīm, namāz does not become nullified. For example, to say “wa bilwalideynī

-262-

ihsānan wa berren.” Namāz does not become nullified even if that word does not exist in the Qur’ān al-kerīm. Another example is to say, “wa nahlun wa tuffāhun wa rum’mān.” But Abū Yūsuf (rahmatullāhi ta’ālā ’alaih) said that it would be nullified.

When a word is forgotten, if the meaning is not changed namāz does not become nullified. For instance, while saying “wa jazāu seyyiatin seyyiatun misluhā,” if you omit “seyyiatun” it does not become nullified. If the meaning is changed, namāz becomes nullified. For example, when saying “lā yu’minūn,” if you omit “lā,” it becomes nullified.

When you change a letter itself or its place, if the meaning is not changed and if the new word has a likeness in the Qur’ān, namāz does not become nullified. For instance, if you say “innelmuslimūna” instead of “innelmuslimīna,” it does not become nullified. If it does not have a likeness in the Qur’ān “namāz does not become nullified” according to the two imāms. For example, when you say “kayyāmīne” instead of “kawwāmīne,” it does not become nullified. If the meaning is changed, “it becomes nullified,” said the two imāms. Imām-i Abū Yūsuf said that namāz would become nullified if the word had no likeness in the Qur’ān. It becomes nullified if you say “eshābeshshaīr” instead of “es-hābessa’īr.” He (Abū Yūsuf) said that it would not be nullified if you said “inferejet” instead of “infejeret” or “eyyāb” instead of “awwāb.”

When you repeat a word, namāz becomes nullified if the meaning is changed. It becomes nullified when you say “Rabbi Rabbil’ālemin, māliki māliki yawmiddīn.” But if you do not know that the meaning is changed or if you let the word out inadvertently or if you repeat the word in order to pronounce a letter more correctly, it does not become nullified.

If changing a word changes the meaning, too, namāz becomes nullified even if the new word has a likeness in the Qur’ān. It does not become nullified if the meaning is not changed.

The following is a poem written by Ahmad Ibni Kemāl Pāsha (rahmatullāhi ta’ālā ’alaih) on the sejawands (marks of subdivision) in the Qur’ān:

Jim: Permissible to pass by it, and proper too;
better stop when you see it, though.

-263-

Za: You are free to stop, and so have they[1] done.
But they have deemed it better to read on.

Tż: It is an absolute sign of stop;
Wherever you see it be sure to stop!

Sat: “Stopping is permissible,” they[1] have said;
So they have allowed you to take a breath.

Mim: Absolutely necessary to stop for it;
Fear of disbelief is in passing by it!

Lā: “No pause!” is its meaning, everywhere;
Never stop! Nor breathe, anywhere!

Now perfect your reading with this recipe,
And gift its thawāb to Muslims before thee!

[The letter “’ayn” means rukū’. It means that when conducting namāz in jamā’at, Hadrat ’Umar Fārūq used to stop reciting the Qur’ān while standing and bow for the rukū’. This sign, ’ayn, always comes at the end of āyats. If you stop at the place where the sign lā is, you must begin reading with the previous word. When you stop at the end of an āyat (verse), you do not have to repeat the previous word.]

31 - If a person who has omitted less than five prayers of namāz remembers that he did not perform the previous prayer, his namāz becomes nullified. [For detailed information see the beginning of the twenty-third chapter!].

Whether outdoors or at any place within a big or small mosque, if a woman or a man or a dog passes close by or far in front of a person who is performing namāz, his namāz never becomes nullified. He who passes between the worshipper’s feet and the place of sajda outdoors or in a big mosque, or between his feet and the wall of the qibla in a room or small mosque, becomes sinful. Any mosque between whose qibla wall and back wall is less than twenty metres is called a small mosque. He who passes in front of a person who is

---------------------------------

[1] The early savants, who knew how to read the Qur'ān al-kerīm correctly.

-264-

performing namāz on something higher than level, such as a bank or a sofa, becomes sinful if his head is above the worshipper’s feet.

When performing namāz at places where others may pass in front, it is sunnat for the imām or for the individual worshipper to erect a stick longer than half a meter before himself in line with his left eyebrow. If he cannot set the stick upright he may lay it on the ground towards the qibla or just draw a line. It is permissible to prevent a person from passing in front of you by signalling or by raising your voice; yet, it is better not to.

It is written in Halabī-yi kebīr: “Swallowing blood oozing out from between the teeth does not nullify namāz unless it equals a mouthful.” One’s ablution is not broken even if one swallows mouthfully.

Existence of women among the jamā’at is written in chapter 20. It is fard to perform again a fard namāz that was fāsid. It is wājib to perform again any prayers in which tahrīmi mekrūhs took place and also those sunnats and supererogatory prayers that have become fāsid. Please see the twenty-third chapter.

"So you have reached that age; what deeds have you done?
"Now you reproach yourself, for your life is gone?
"Fie upon you, after all that you have done!"
 If Allah says so, how will you answer Him?

"I showed you two choices, and gave you wisdom;
"To pick one of choices, I gave you freedom.
"Behind your nafs, you ignored Islam's dictum!"

 
If Allah says so, how will you answer Him?

"Hot as well as cold kept you from ablution. .,
"To namāz you preferred mundane delusion.
"Lingering junub, you ignored ablution."

 If Allah says so, how will you answer Him?

"Why didn't you make wudū and perform prayer?
"What kept you from begging and praying Creator?
"Making ghusl was binding summer and winter!"

 If Allah says so, how will yon answer Him?

-265-